Re: clk: rockchip: Checking a kmemdup() call in rockchip_clk_register_pll()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>> Would you like to adjust such exception handling another bit?
>
> Nope.
>
> The big difference is that clocks rely heavily on their names to establish
> the clock tree parentship. So the PLL cannot work without the name

This error situation got a specific reaction.


> but can provide some means of functionality without the rate-table
> especially as bootloaders do generally initialize a PLL to some form of
> sane frequency.

I imagine that a choice is available here for the error handling strategy.

* Return “ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM)” as a strict response like in the other error case.

* Fix the setting “pll->rate_count” at least (to be a bit more tolerant).
  Would any system users wonder then about the availability of only
  a single frequency (instead of possibly expected alternatives)?

Regards,
Markus

_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip




[Index of Archives]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux