Re: [PATCH 3/4] media: hantro: Add helper for the H264 motion vectors allocation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2019-09-04 at 12:17 +0200, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-09-03 at 15:17 -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> > Introduce a helper to allow easier enablement of the post-processing
> > feature. No functional changes intended.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro.h      | 6 ++++++
> >  drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_v4l2.c | 4 ++--
> >  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro.h b/drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro.h
> > index deb90ae37859..e8872f24e351 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro.h
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro.h
> > @@ -381,4 +381,10 @@ hantro_get_dst_buf(struct hantro_ctx *ctx)
> >  	return v4l2_m2m_next_dst_buf(ctx->fh.m2m_ctx);
> >  }
> >  
> > +static inline unsigned int
> > +hantro_h264_buffer_extra_size(unsigned int width, unsigned int height)
> > +
> > +	return 128 * MB_WIDTH(width) * MB_HEIGHT(height);
> > +}
> 
> This doesn't seem to be used or modified by patch 4 at all?
> 

Oh, thanks for spotting this. Indeed, this patch is superflous.
The helper was used, but then after cleaning-up hantro_postproc.c
I realized it wasn't needed.

We can drop this one, but OTOH hiding the H264 extra size seems
a nice cleanup. Perhaps Jonas can grab this patch as part
of his improvements series.

Thanks,
Ezequiel


_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip



[Index of Archives]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux