On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 13:06:10 +0900 Tomasz Figa <tfiga@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Boris, > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 9:15 PM Boris Brezillon > <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > [snip] > > @@ -533,10 +535,21 @@ hantro_queue_setup(struct vb2_queue *vq, unsigned int *num_buffers, > > return -EINVAL; > > } > > > > + /* The H264 decoder needs extra size on the output buffer. */ > > + if (ctx->vpu_src_fmt->fourcc == V4L2_PIX_FMT_H264_SLICE_RAW) > > + extra_size0 = 128 * DIV_ROUND_UP(pixfmt->width, 16) * > > + DIV_ROUND_UP(pixfmt->height, 16); > > + > > I wonder if this shouldn't be accounted for already in the sizeimage > returned by TRY_/S_FMT, so that the application can know the required > buffer size if it uses some external allocator and DMABUF memory type. > I know we had it like this in our downstream code, but it wasn't the > problem because we use minigbm, where we explicitly add the same > padding in the rockchip backend. Any thoughts? Actually, I was wondering why it was not counted in ->sizeimage. I thought you had a good reason to not expose the extra size to userspace so I kept it like that. _______________________________________________ Linux-rockchip mailing list Linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
