Hi, On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 2:43 PM Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Add the register specifier description for an > optional gamma LUT address. > > Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip-vop.txt | 10 +++++++++- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip-vop.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip-vop.txt > index 4f58c5a2d195..97ad78cc7e03 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip-vop.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip-vop.txt > @@ -20,6 +20,13 @@ Required properties: > "rockchip,rk3228-vop"; > "rockchip,rk3328-vop"; > > +- reg: Must contain one entry corresponding to the base address and length > + of the register space. Can optionally contain a second entry > + corresponding to the CRTC gamma LUT address. > + > +- reg-names: "base" for the base register space. If present, the CRTC > + gamma LUT name should be "lut". As per Rob Herring, current suggestion is to avoid reg-names when possible. The code should just look for the presence of a 2nd entry and assume that if it's there that it's the lut range. Full context: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAL_Jsq+MMunmVWqeW9v2RyzsMKP+=kMzeTHNMG4JDHM7Fy0HBg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ -Doug _______________________________________________ Linux-rockchip mailing list Linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
