Hi, On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 5:10 AM Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 at 01:42, Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > We want SDIO drivers to be able to temporarily stop retuning when the > > driver knows that the SDIO card is not in a state where retuning will > > work (maybe because the card is asleep). We'll move the relevant > > functions to a place where drivers can call them. > > > > Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > This looks good to me. > > BTW, seems like this series is best funneled via my mmc tree, no? In > such case, I need acks for the brcmfmac driver patches. For patch #1 I think it could just go in directly to the wireless tree. It should be fine to land the rest of the patches separately. For patch #2 - #5 then what you say makes sense to me. I suppose you'd want at least a Reviewed-by from Arend and an Ack from Kalle on the Broadcom patches? I'd also suggest that we Cc stable explicitly when applying. That's easy for #2 and #3 since they have a Fixes tag. For #4 and #5 I guess the question is how far back to go. Maybe Adrian has an opinion here since I think he's the one who experienced these problems. Thanks! -Doug _______________________________________________ Linux-rockchip mailing list Linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
