On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 07:08:57PM +0200, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> default:
> - pr_warn("%s ramp_delay: %d not supported, setting 10000\n",
> - rdev->desc->name, ramp_delay);
> + dev_warn(&rdev->dev,
> + "%s ramp_delay: %d not supported, setting 10000\n",
> + rdev->desc->name, ramp_delay);
This appears to be unrelated and should've been a separate patch.
> +static int rk817_check_suspend_voltage(int id)
> +{
> + if (id >= RK817_ID_DCDC1 && id <= RK817_ID_LDO9)
> + return 0;
> + return -1;
> +}
Rather than have these checks in the implementation you should just not
define these operations for regulators that don't have the
functionality.
> +static unsigned int rk8xx_regulator_of_map_mode(unsigned int mode)
> +{
> + if (mode == 1)
> + return REGULATOR_MODE_FAST;
> + if (mode == 2)
> + return REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL;
> +
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
This should be written as a switch statement for clarity.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Linux-rockchip mailing list Linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
