From: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, May 10, 2019 at 3:35 PM To: Mark Brown, Benson Leung, Enric Balletbo i Serra Cc: <linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <drinkcat@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Guenter Roeck, <briannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <mka@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Douglas Anderson, <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > This reverts commit 37a186225a0c020516bafad2727fdcdfc039a1e4. > > We have a better solution in the patch ("platform/chrome: cros_ec_spi: > Set ourselves as timing sensitive"). Let's revert the uglier and less > reliable solution. > > Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <groeck@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > > drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_spi.c | 80 ++------------------------- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_spi.c b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_spi.c > index 757a115502ec..70ff1ad09012 100644 > --- a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_spi.c > +++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_spi.c > @@ -75,27 +75,6 @@ struct cros_ec_spi { > unsigned int end_of_msg_delay; > }; > > -typedef int (*cros_ec_xfer_fn_t) (struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev, > - struct cros_ec_command *ec_msg); > - > -/** > - * struct cros_ec_xfer_work_params - params for our high priority workers > - * > - * @work: The work_struct needed to queue work > - * @fn: The function to use to transfer > - * @ec_dev: ChromeOS EC device > - * @ec_msg: Message to transfer > - * @ret: The return value of the function > - */ > - > -struct cros_ec_xfer_work_params { > - struct work_struct work; > - cros_ec_xfer_fn_t fn; > - struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev; > - struct cros_ec_command *ec_msg; > - int ret; > -}; > - > static void debug_packet(struct device *dev, const char *name, u8 *ptr, > int len) > { > @@ -371,13 +350,13 @@ static int cros_ec_spi_receive_response(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev, > } > > /** > - * do_cros_ec_pkt_xfer_spi - Transfer a packet over SPI and receive the reply > + * cros_ec_pkt_xfer_spi - Transfer a packet over SPI and receive the reply > * > * @ec_dev: ChromeOS EC device > * @ec_msg: Message to transfer > */ > -static int do_cros_ec_pkt_xfer_spi(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev, > - struct cros_ec_command *ec_msg) > +static int cros_ec_pkt_xfer_spi(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev, > + struct cros_ec_command *ec_msg) > { > struct ec_host_response *response; > struct cros_ec_spi *ec_spi = ec_dev->priv; > @@ -514,13 +493,13 @@ static int do_cros_ec_pkt_xfer_spi(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev, > } > > /** > - * do_cros_ec_cmd_xfer_spi - Transfer a message over SPI and receive the reply > + * cros_ec_cmd_xfer_spi - Transfer a message over SPI and receive the reply > * > * @ec_dev: ChromeOS EC device > * @ec_msg: Message to transfer > */ > -static int do_cros_ec_cmd_xfer_spi(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev, > - struct cros_ec_command *ec_msg) > +static int cros_ec_cmd_xfer_spi(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev, > + struct cros_ec_command *ec_msg) > { > struct cros_ec_spi *ec_spi = ec_dev->priv; > struct spi_transfer trans; > @@ -632,53 +611,6 @@ static int do_cros_ec_cmd_xfer_spi(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev, > return ret; > } > > -static void cros_ec_xfer_high_pri_work(struct work_struct *work) > -{ > - struct cros_ec_xfer_work_params *params; > - > - params = container_of(work, struct cros_ec_xfer_work_params, work); > - params->ret = params->fn(params->ec_dev, params->ec_msg); > -} > - > -static int cros_ec_xfer_high_pri(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev, > - struct cros_ec_command *ec_msg, > - cros_ec_xfer_fn_t fn) > -{ > - struct cros_ec_xfer_work_params params; > - > - INIT_WORK_ONSTACK(¶ms.work, cros_ec_xfer_high_pri_work); > - params.ec_dev = ec_dev; > - params.ec_msg = ec_msg; > - params.fn = fn; > - > - /* > - * This looks a bit ridiculous. Why do the work on a > - * different thread if we're just going to block waiting for > - * the thread to finish? The key here is that the thread is > - * running at high priority but the calling context might not > - * be. We need to be at high priority to avoid getting > - * context switched out for too long and the EC giving up on > - * the transfer. > - */ > - queue_work(system_highpri_wq, ¶ms.work); > - flush_work(¶ms.work); > - destroy_work_on_stack(¶ms.work); > - > - return params.ret; > -} > - > -static int cros_ec_pkt_xfer_spi(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev, > - struct cros_ec_command *ec_msg) > -{ > - return cros_ec_xfer_high_pri(ec_dev, ec_msg, do_cros_ec_pkt_xfer_spi); > -} > - > -static int cros_ec_cmd_xfer_spi(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev, > - struct cros_ec_command *ec_msg) > -{ > - return cros_ec_xfer_high_pri(ec_dev, ec_msg, do_cros_ec_cmd_xfer_spi); > -} > - > static void cros_ec_spi_dt_probe(struct cros_ec_spi *ec_spi, struct device *dev) > { > struct device_node *np = dev->of_node; > -- > 2.21.0.1020.gf2820cf01a-goog > _______________________________________________ Linux-rockchip mailing list Linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip