Re: [RESEND PATCH v7 05/11] rockchip: dts: rk3399: nanopi4: Use CD pin as RK_FUNC_1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/05/2019 06:41, Jagan Teki wrote:
sdmmc cd pin is configured as RK_FUNC_GPIO which is wrong and
indeed failed to detect the sdcard on the board with below error

   Card did not respond to voltage select!

So, fix it by replacing RK_FUNC_GPIO with RK_FUNC_1 which
is already defined in rk3399.dts so make use of same like
other boards.

AFAICS this should also be true of RockPro64 and (at least with the Linux DT) Firefly - those aren't grabbing &sdmmc_cd by default either. I imagine that U-Boot might also see similar problems on Gru, where the card detect signal is on a completely different GPIO.

I'd note that in Linux, only rk3399-evb is actually *using* &sdmmc_cd - despite the fact that they claim it, nearly all the other boards also have "cd-gpios" and thus end up overriding the dedicated function with an implicit GPIO configuration anyway. Sapphire is the odd one out in using "broken-cd" as the less-efficient way of mitigating the runtime PM issue.

Add these changes in -u-boot.dtsi to make Linux sync easy for future
changes.

Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  arch/arm/dts/rk3399-nanopi4-u-boot.dtsi | 9 +++++++++
  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
  create mode 100644 arch/arm/dts/rk3399-nanopi4-u-boot.dtsi

diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/rk3399-nanopi4-u-boot.dtsi b/arch/arm/dts/rk3399-nanopi4-u-boot.dtsi
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..20db99c0b8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm/dts/rk3399-nanopi4-u-boot.dtsi
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2019 Jagan Teki <jagan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+ */
+
+&sdmmc {
+	pinctrl-names = "default";

That's already set in the base DTSI, so doesn't really need to be shadowed here.

+	pinctrl-0 = <&sdmmc_bus4 &sdmmc_clk &sdmmc_cmd &sdmmc_cd>;
+};


I suppose you could also delete the "cd-gpios" property to make it really clear what this override is for (and save a few bytes if it's going to be ignored anyway).

Robin.

_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip



[Index of Archives]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux