Hi, On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 11:14 AM Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Each transfer has it's own work struct (allocated on the stack), hence > a) does not occur. b) is still true, but shouldn't be a problem on > its own. Actually, it could be much worse _because_ it's on the stack. The worker could write something back to the work after the work has been de-allocated. That's bad. > Anyway, using flush_work() as you suggested is the better solution :) Yup, thanks! _______________________________________________ Linux-rockchip mailing list Linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
