Re: [RFC] mmc: core: set initial signal voltage on power off

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2019-02-25 17:19, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 at 11:12, Jonas Karlman <jonas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 2019-02-18 12:54, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>> On Sun, 17 Feb 2019 at 23:14, Jonas Karlman <jonas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> Some boards have SD card connectors where the power rail cannot be switched
>>>> off by the driver. If the card has not been power cycled, it may still be
>>>> using 1.8V signaling after a warm re-boot. Bootroms expecting 3.3V signaling
>>>> will fail to boot from a UHS card that continue to use 1.8V signaling.
>>> Is the problem limited to a "warm manual re-boot" or does it exists
>>> for an emergency reboot as well!?
>> I think the issue may also exist for emergency reboot based on the Asus Tinker Board kernel commit at [1],
>> not sure how this could be solved in an acceptable way. Personally I do not have sysrq enabled on my boards.
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/TinkerBoard/debian_kernel/commit/1e8970dbfc20166788e3428ec5203f7673f6087b
>>
> For eMMC we have pwrseq_emmc.c, where we register a restart handler to
> cover these cases. Not very nice, but the best we could come up with.

Thanks, I will see if I can adopt something similar in a followup patch.

>
>>>> Set initial signal voltage in mmc_power_off() to allow re-boot to function.
>>> I think this sounds like a reasonable way forward, to improve the situation.
>> I may have exaggerated the issue in the above line, the board will reboot as long as
>> UHS 1.8V signaling is not used, current upstream device trees is missing the sd-uhs-* flags
>> and will thus reboot as they are capped at sd high speed and 3.3V signaling.
> Okay, I see.
>
>>>> This fixes re-boot with UHS cards on Asus Tinker Board (Rockchip RK3288),
>>>> same issue have been seen on some Rockchip RK3399 boards.
>>>>
>>>> I am sending this as a RFC because I have no insights into SD/MMC subsystem,
>>>> this change fix a re-boot issue on my boards and does not break emmc/sdio.
>>>> Is this an acceptable workaround? Any advice is appreciated.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>>  drivers/mmc/core/core.c | 8 ++++++++
>>>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
>>>> index 5bd58b95d318..69d7021916ae 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
>>>> @@ -1684,6 +1684,14 @@ void mmc_power_off(struct mmc_host *host)
>>>>         if (host->ios.power_mode == MMC_POWER_OFF)
>>>>                 return;
>>>>
>>>> +       mmc_set_initial_signal_voltage(host);
>>> I would rather try to move this below mmc_set_initial_state() a few
>>> lines below in mmc_power_off(). To me, it seems safer to do the
>>> regular power off thingy first.
>>>
>>> Additionally, I would drop the added delay below, as there is already
>>> a delay after calling mmc_set_initial_state() and I think/hope that
>>> should be sufficient.
>> Thanks for the suggestion, the reason I put the mmc_set_initial_signal_voltage() call
>> before mmc_pwrseq_power_off() call was to do it in reverse order of mmc_power_on(),
>>
>> I will run some more tests on my boards to see if moving it below mmc_set_initial_state()
>> also makes it possible to reboot with UHS cards using 1.8V signaling enabled.
> Great, so I am expecting an update from you, thanks!

I have done some more testing and concluded that mmc_set_initial_signal_voltage() must be called
before host->ios.vdd = 0 statement or the Tinker Board would not reboot from sd-card when 1.8V signal voltage is used.
The sleep was not needed on my device.

I still want to do more tests on my other rockchip boards that have UHS support and is not enabled in device tree.
Currently I test [1] where vccio_sd regulator-always-on/regulator-boot-on ensures the IO regulator is not powered off,
sd-uhs-sdr* flags to enable UHS and mmc_set_initial_signal_voltage() to change IO regulator to 3.3V before reboot.

I will follow up with more test results next week after I have tested on other rockchip rk3328/rk3399 devices.

[1] https://github.com/Kwiboo/linux-rockchip/compare/v5.0-rc7...patch-rk-5.x-tinker-uhs

Regards,
Jonas

>
> [...]
>
> Kind regards
> Uffe

_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip



[Index of Archives]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux