Hello David, I agree, of course coordination is not always so simple, I did not know Arch didn't have this configured yet. As for patching, I agree, but the Tinker has some... peculiarities, I am a hardware guy, software is a passtime, so my code is not always perhaps up to standard. And I wasn't 100% on submitting changes to the device tree based on a staging driver. Most of my work has been absorbed into https://github.com/Miouyouyou/RockMyy . As for your approach, as I said, the wifi is the same as I have except for the reset/enables and the DDR50, which I didn't know the rtl8723bs supported. BT I have no in-kernel support for other than enabling the RTS pin to the device tree, I handle it in user space for now. I've been watching the hci_h5 conversation, I'll look into testing these changes/options tonight perhaps once I make sure our rockchip-dev recipes are still valid with the newest RC, and can have them committed so others can test. Thank you, -Tony On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 10:55 AM David Summers <beagleboard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 17/02/2019 14:32, Tony McKahan wrote: > > A similar configuration has been in use on Armbian images since kernel > > 4.14, but not in a clean enough format for submission. I will test > > this, but the only differences I see compared to ours are combination > > of the mystery "chip_h" power domain/reset with the Wifi one and the > > inclusion of sd_uhs_ddr50. > > > > -Tony > > > > On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 7:16 AM David Summers > > <beagleboard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> This patch adds the wifi to the ASUS Tinker Board (S) machines. > >> > Tony, thanks for the interest in this and the Bluetooth RFC. To my mind > it would be good if we could mainline an agreed solution. As much as > anything doesn't make sense to me for Armbian and ArchLinux Arm to have > independent solutions. > > In the ArchLinux Arm camp I'm not a fan of applying many patches to > support a board, as much as anything it makes that board non generic - > and so has to have its own hand crafted kernel. This to me isn't a good > solution, so if possible prefer the pain of getting it mainlined. > > Stefan Wahren has come up with a minimal patch to hci_h5 for bluetooth, > that says the relevant properties can be read from the device tree. This > means that acpi is no longer necessary. Thats currently out in testing. > > Anyway would be good if Arch and Armbian could merge our efforts ... > > Regards, > > David. > _______________________________________________ Linux-rockchip mailing list Linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
