On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 12:05:31 +0000, Robin Murphy wrote: > There are a number of subtle differences between the nanopi4 variants, > and where they disagree, the common DTSI currently follows the details > of NanoPi M4. In order to improve matters even more, let's add a > separate DTS for the M4 to which we can start splitting things out > appropriately. The third variant, NanoPi NEO4, is a lot closer to the M4 > than either is to the larger T4, so arguably could get away with just > sharing the M4 DT for now (plus I have neither of the smaller boards to > actually test with). > > CC: Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> > CC: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx> > --- > > v2: Fix the copy-paste binding thinko > > .../devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml | 6 ++++-- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile | 1 + > .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-nanopi-m4.dts | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-nanopi-m4.dts > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ Linux-rockchip mailing list Linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
