On Mon, 2019-01-07 at 14:26 +0100, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sorry, only now got to test this on actual hardware,
>
> Am Freitag, 14. Dezember 2018, 17:29:20 CET schrieb Ezequiel Garcia:
> > From: Daniele Castagna <dcastagna@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Currently, YUV hardware overlays are converted to RGB using
> > a color space conversion different than BT.601.
> >
> > The result is that colors of e.g. NV12 buffers don't match
> > colors of YUV hardware overlays.
> >
> > In order to fix this, enable YUV2YUV and set appropriate coefficients
> > for formats such as NV12 to be displayed correctly.
> >
> > This commit was tested using modetest, gstreamer and chromeos (hardware
> > accelerated video playback). Before the commit, tests rendering
> > with NV12 format resulted in colors not displayed correctly.
> >
> > Test examples (RK3399 Ficus board connected to HDMI monitor):
> >
> > $ modetest 39@32:1920x1080@NV12
> > $ gst-launch-1.0 videotestrc ! video/x-raw,format=NV12 ! kmssink
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniele Castagna <dcastagna@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > [ezequiel: rebase on linux-next and massage commit log]
> > Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > v2:
> > * Addressed feedback from Sean Paul
> > * Rebased on linux-next
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.h | 13 +++++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_vop_reg.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
> > index fb70fb486fbf..78c7f63a60c0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
> > @@ -52,6 +52,18 @@
> > vop_reg_set(vop, &win->phy->scl->ext->name, \
> > win->base, ~0, v, #name)
> >
> > +#define VOP_WIN_YUV2YUV_SET(x, win_yuv2yuv, name, v) \
> > + do { \
> > + if (win_yuv2yuv->name.mask) \
> > + vop_reg_set(vop, &win_yuv2yuv->name, 0, ~0, v, #name); \
> > + } while (0)
> > +
> > +#define VOP_WIN_YUV2YUV_COEFFICIENT_SET(x, win_yuv2yuv, name, v) \
> > + do { \
> > + if (win_yuv2yuv->phy->name.mask) \
> > + vop_reg_set(vop, &win_yuv2yuv->phy->name, win_yuv2yuv->base, ~0, v, #name); \
> > + } while (0)
> > +
>
> While this seems to work on rk3399, it hangs both my rk3328 (rock64)
> and rk3288 (google-pinky) during rockchip-drm probe.
>
Oh, shame on me, I should've done that.
> Making this something like
>
> if (win_yuv2yuv && win_yuv2yuv->phy->name.mask) \
>
> aka testing for existence of win_yuv2yuv first, makes them boot again,
> so I guess I ran into a (for whatever reason) silent null-ptr-dereference.
>
Sounds good. I'll post a v3.
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_vop_reg.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_vop_reg.c
> > index 08fc40af52c8..fe752df4e038 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_vop_reg.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_vop_reg.c
> > @@ -637,6 +637,34 @@ static const struct vop_output rk3399_output = {
> > .mipi_dual_channel_en = VOP_REG(RK3288_SYS_CTRL, 0x1, 3),
> > };
> >
> > +static const struct vop_yuv2yuv_phy rk3399_yuv2yuv_win01_data = {
> > + .y2r_coefficients = {
> > + VOP_REG(RK3399_WIN0_YUV2YUV_Y2R + 0, 0xffff, 0),
> > + VOP_REG(RK3399_WIN0_YUV2YUV_Y2R + 0, 0xffff, 16),
> > + VOP_REG(RK3399_WIN0_YUV2YUV_Y2R + 4, 0xffff, 0),
> > + VOP_REG(RK3399_WIN0_YUV2YUV_Y2R + 4, 0xffff, 16),
> > + VOP_REG(RK3399_WIN0_YUV2YUV_Y2R + 8, 0xffff, 0),
> > + VOP_REG(RK3399_WIN0_YUV2YUV_Y2R + 8, 0xffff, 16),
> > + VOP_REG(RK3399_WIN0_YUV2YUV_Y2R + 12, 0xffff, 0),
> > + VOP_REG(RK3399_WIN0_YUV2YUV_Y2R + 12, 0xffff, 16),
> > + VOP_REG(RK3399_WIN0_YUV2YUV_Y2R + 16, 0xffff, 0),
> > + VOP_REG(RK3399_WIN0_YUV2YUV_Y2R + 20, 0xffffffff, 0),
> > + VOP_REG(RK3399_WIN0_YUV2YUV_Y2R + 24, 0xffffffff, 0),
> > + VOP_REG(RK3399_WIN0_YUV2YUV_Y2R + 28, 0xffffffff, 0),
> > + },
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct vop_yuv2yuv_phy rk3399_yuv2yuv_win23_data = { };
>
> looking at the rk3399 TRM it seems that win2+3 also have yuv2rgb
> coefficient registers. I didn't check in depth but are they so different
> that they cannot be supported?
>
> Aka what is the difference between win0/1 and win2/3 ?
>
>
I think Sandy is the best to answer this. I can't say I'm an expert
on the details of this hardware.
Thanks,
Eze
_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
