On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 6:15 PM Heiko Stuebner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 4. Oktober 2018, 16:18:06 CEST schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
> > On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 3:38 AM Heiko Stuebner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > The following changes since commit 78f26da3ffbce0ea3692a89fe3f5487cb8dda068:
> > >
> > > arm64: dts: rockchip: Add type-c port supply on rk3399-sapphire board (2018-09-10 19:16:26 +0200)
> > >
> > > are available in the Git repository at:
> > >
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mmind/linux-rockchip.git tags/v4.20-rockchip-dts64-2
> > >
> > > for you to fetch changes up to e78d53c7b2873e0724eb765a88ccde42560b0e05:
> > >
> > > arm64: dts: rockchip: enable display nodes on rk3328-rock64 (2018-09-28 13:18:37 +0200)
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Some additional new boards, the rk3399-based RockPro64 from Pine64, as well
> > > as the Vamrs Rock960. Another big feature is display support including hdmi
> > > and the Innosilicon hdmiphy on the rk3328, right now enabled on the rock64.
> > > The rock64 also got its spi-nor and spdif enabled. On the px30 we can see
> > > dwc2-based usb support now and finally some misc fixes, like for a new dtc
> > > warning, missing address and size cells and microSD fix on sapphire.
> >
> > Nice to see those new boards!
> >
> > What about the bugfixes though, shouldn't at least the sapphire microSD fix
> > be merged into 4.19 and possibly backported to stable kernels?
> >
> > I've pulled this into next/dt for now, please have a look at whether we
> > also want some of them in the fixes branch for 4.19. Thanks,
>
> The fixes aren't that critical:
> - the dtc warning stems from the updated dtc that will get merged
> into 4.20, so doesn't affect current kernels
> - the first board using a dsi-display at all is still in flight, so the
> missing -*cells aren't really causing issues on old kernels
> - and finally I think Vicente is the only actual user of a sapphire
> board (they are rk3399 eval boards after all) and he's using new
> kernels and is still making new things work on that board.
>
> So I'd think it we can save stable-maintainers time for breakage that
> affects bigger crowds ;-)
Ok, thanks for checking!
Arnd
_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
