Am Montag, 10. September 2018, 17:13:54 CEST schrieb Manivannan Sadhasivam: > Add devicetree binding for Rock960 board from Vamrs Limited. > > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.txt | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.txt > index acfd3c773dd0..aaad9e2ff9a3 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.txt > @@ -5,6 +5,10 @@ Rockchip platforms device tree bindings > Required root node properties: > - compatible = "vamrs,ficus", "rockchip,rk3399"; > > +- 96boards RK3399 Rock960 (ROCK960 Consumer Edition) > + Required root node properties: > + - compatible = "vamrs,rk3399-rock960", "rockchip,rk3399"; hmm, are there more boards labeled rock960 from Vamrs? Because I'm trying to determine what makes "vamrs,rock960" unsuitable. Heiko _______________________________________________ Linux-rockchip mailing list Linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
