Hi Heiko,
On 15/08/18 12:29, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> Hi Enric,
>
> Am Mittwoch, 15. August 2018, 11:59:32 CEST schrieb Enric Balletbo i Serra:
>> Commit 98898f3bc83c8 ("phy: rockchip-inno-usb2: support otg-port for
>> rk3399") introduces two new properties. The extcon property is used to
>> detect the cable-state, and the rockchip,utmi-avalid is used to indicate
>> which register should be used to detect the vbus state.
>>
>> Document these properties in the documentation binding.
>>
>> Fixes: 98898f3bc83c8 ("phy: rockchip-inno-usb2: support otg-port for rk3399")
>> Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>
>> .../devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-rockchip-inno-usb2.txt | 3 +++
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-rockchip-inno-usb2.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-rockchip-inno-usb2.txt
>> index 074a7b3b0425..2d4808d3920b 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-rockchip-inno-usb2.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-rockchip-inno-usb2.txt
>> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ Optional properties:
>> register files". When set driver will request its
>> phandle as one companion-grf for some special SoCs
>> (e.g RV1108).
>> + - extcon : phandle to the extcon device for the otg phy.
>
> That should probably mention that this is the extcon providing the cable-state?
ack.
>
>
>> Required nodes : a sub-node is required for each port the phy provides.
>> The sub-node name is used to identify host or otg port,
>> @@ -45,6 +46,8 @@ Required properties (port (child) node):
>> Optional properties:
>> - phy-supply : phandle to a regulator that provides power to VBUS.
>> See ./phy-bindings.txt for details.
>> + - rockchip,utmi-avalid : boolean, use the avalid register to get vbus status.
>> + Otherwise, use the bvalid register.
>
> Not having looked to deeply into the usb2 phy, this might raise questions
> on why this is a hardware-description? Is this needed when something is not
> connected on the board?
I asked myself the same question and even I thought in just remove that code.
After some investigation, though, I saw that the UTMI+ specification [1] has two
signals similar to ID signal (page 11), the AValid signal is used to indicate if
the session for an A-peripheral is valid and the BValid signal that is used to
indicate if the session for a B-peripheral is valid. I suppose that use of one
or the other matters in some cases, but AFAICT this is not used and I didn't see
any binding using it.
Maybe someone else can give us more clues on the importance or not of this property?
[1] https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/brochure/UTMI-PLUS-SPECIFICATION.pdf
Enric
>
>
> Heiko
>
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
