On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 6:03 PM, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Souptick, > > Am Dienstag, 31. Juli 2018, 22:34:30 CEST schrieb Souptick Joarder: >> convert drm_atomic_helper_suspend/resume() to use >> drm_mode_config_helper_suspend/resume(). >> >> With this conversion, rockchip_drm_fb_resume() and >> rockchip_drm_fb_suspend() will not be used anymore. >> Both of these functions can be removed. >> >> Also, in struct rockchip_drm_private state will not be >> used anymore. So this can be removed forever. >> >> Signed-off-by: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@xxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Ajit Negi <ajitn.linux@xxxxxxxxx> > > the patch itself looks great, just a simple bookkeeping question. > > What role did Ajit play in creating the patch? If I remember correctly > it is meant to be > - 1st Signed-off: Patch-Author > - 2nd Signed-off: E-Mail sender + patch possibly patch changes > (optional of course if the same) > > So was this meant to be a Reviewed-by from Ajit? We both are working together for these patches to convert drm_atomic_helper_suspend/resume(). That's the reason to add his name in 2nd Signed-off in all similar patches. Is it a incorrect way to put 2nd Signed-off here ? _______________________________________________ Linux-rockchip mailing list Linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
