On 2018-05-23 2:02 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 11:52:05AM +0800, djw at t-chip.com.cn wrote:
>> From: Levin Du <djw at t-chip.com.cn>
>>
>> Some GPIOs sit in the GRF_SOC_CON registers of Rockchip SoCs,
>> which do not belong to the general pinctrl.
>>
>> Adding gpio-syscon support makes controlling regulator or
>> LED using these special pins very easy by reusing existing
>> drivers, such as gpio-regulator and led-gpio.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Levin Du <djw at t-chip.com.cn>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>> - Rename gpio_syscon10 to gpio_mute in doc
>>
>> Changes in v1:
>> - Refactured for general gpio-syscon usage for Rockchip SoCs.
>> - Add doc rockchip,gpio-syscon.txt
>>
>> .../bindings/gpio/rockchip,gpio-syscon.txt | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-syscon.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 71 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/rockchip,gpio-syscon.txt
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/rockchip,gpio-syscon.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/rockchip,gpio-syscon.txt
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..b1b2a67
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/rockchip,gpio-syscon.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
>> +* Rockchip GPIO support for GRF_SOC_CON registers
>> +
>> +Required properties:
>> +- compatible: Should contain "rockchip,gpio-syscon".
>> +- gpio-controller: Marks the device node as a gpio controller.
>> +- #gpio-cells: Should be two. The first cell is the pin number and
>> + the second cell is used to specify the gpio polarity:
>> + 0 = Active high,
>> + 1 = Active low.
> There's no need for this child node. Just make the parent node a gpio
> controller.
>
> Rob
Hi Rob, it is not clear to me. Do you suggest that the grf node should
be a gpio controller,
like below?
+??? grf: syscon at ff100000 {
+??? ??? compatible = "rockchip,gpio-syscon", "rockchip,rk3328-grf",
"syscon", "simple-mfd";
+??? ??? //...
+??? ??? gpio-controller;
+??? ??? #gpio-cells = <2>;
+??? ??? gpio,syscon-dev = <&grf 0x0428 0>;
+??? };
or just reserve the following case in the doc?
+??? grf: syscon at ff100000 {
+??? ??? compatible = "rockchip,rk3328-grf", "syscon", "simple-mfd";
+??? ??? //...
+??? };
+
+??? gpio_mute: gpio-mute {
+??? ??? compatible = "rockchip,gpio-syscon";
+??? ??? gpio-controller;
+??? ??? #gpio-cells = <2>;
+??? ??? gpio,syscon-dev = <&grf 0x0428 0>;
+??? };
Thanks
Levin
