Hi, Am Sonntag, 13. Mai 2018, 17:18:12 CEST schrieb Tao Huang: > Hi Heiko: > > On 2018?05?12? 06:11, Heiko Stuebner wrote: > > Here I have a naming question. When looking at the vendor kernel > > it looks like the px30 is largely related to the rk3326. > > (rk3326.dtsi includeing the px30.dtsi) > > > > What is the reason for basing the naming on the px30 this time? And could > > we possibly keep to rkXXXX names for the basic things in the kernel, thus > > keeping the pxXX as second name, like with the other px-variants before? > > PX30 and RK3326 are different chips. PX30 has more features. You can simply > think that RK3326 is a subset of PX30. The RK3326 is more like a PX30 > derivative chip. This is not the same as the previous chips. So we use PX30 > instead of RK3326 for name, and the opening document is only for PX30, we > think this is more convenient for developers. ok, sounds reasonable :-) ... So we'll stay with the PX30. Heiko
