Hi Laurent,
On 03/03/2018 05:49 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Enric,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Friday, 2 March 2018 19:57:57 EET Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
>> From: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen at rock-chips.com>
>>
>> We inited connector in attach(), so need a detach() to cleanup.
>
> Do we ? The dw-hdmi driver already sets drm_connector_cleanup() as the
> connector .destroy() handler, and the .destroy() operation is called by the
> DRM core. None of the other bridge drivers call drm_connector_cleanup()
> directly.
hmmm, checking the code, there are also lots of drivers do the
cleanup(drm_connector_cleanup or funcs->destroy):
drm# grep -r "connector.*funcs->destroy" .
./rockchip/inno_hdmi.c: hdmi->connector.funcs->destroy(&hdmi->connector);
./rockchip/cdn-dp-core.c: connector->funcs->destroy(connector);
./bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c:
dp->connector.funcs->destroy(&dp->connector);
./msm/hdmi/hdmi.c:
hdmi->connector->funcs->destroy(hdmi->connector);
./msm/dsi/dsi.c:
msm_dsi->connector->funcs->destroy(msm_dsi->connector);
./msm/edp/edp.c:
edp->connector->funcs->destroy(edp->connector);
./zte/zx_hdmi.c: hdmi->connector.funcs->destroy(&hdmi->connector);
./drm_connector.c: connector->funcs->destroy(connector);
./drm_connector.c: connector->funcs->destroy(connector);
./nouveau/dispnv04/disp.c:
connector->funcs->destroy(connector);
./nouveau/nv50_display.c:
mstc->connector.funcs->destroy(&mstc->connector);
./nouveau/nv50_display.c:
connector->funcs->destroy(connector);
when i debug analogix_dp bind/unbind, i found that we need to cleanup
the connector(reported by kmemleak). so i added it to
./bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c...after that i saw dw-hdmi missing
that too(by checking the code), so make this patch.
but i didn't really tested it on devices using dw-hdmi, so i'm not very
sure the dw-hdmi(maybe also other bridges) is the same with analogix_dp.
i can try to find a chromebook veyron to check it next week :)
but even there's a leak, i'm still not very sure about:
should the caller of drm_connector_init cleanup it
or the caller of drm_bridge_attach should do it(for example
analogix_dp_bind/analogix_dp_unbind)
or should the DRM core take care of that?
>
>> Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen at rock-chips.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Thierry Escande <thierry.escande at collabora.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo at collabora.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v9: None
>>
>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-hdmi.c | 8 ++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-hdmi.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-hdmi.c index
>> f9802399cc0d..5626922f95f9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-hdmi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-hdmi.c
>> @@ -1985,6 +1985,13 @@ static int dw_hdmi_bridge_attach(struct drm_bridge
>> *bridge) return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +static void dw_hdmi_bridge_detach(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
>> +{
>> + struct dw_hdmi *hdmi = bridge->driver_private;
>> +
>> + drm_connector_cleanup(&hdmi->connector);
>> +}
>> +
>> static enum drm_mode_status
>> dw_hdmi_bridge_mode_valid(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
>> const struct drm_display_mode *mode)
>> @@ -2041,6 +2048,7 @@ static void dw_hdmi_bridge_enable(struct drm_bridge
>> *bridge)
>>
>> static const struct drm_bridge_funcs dw_hdmi_bridge_funcs = {
>> .attach = dw_hdmi_bridge_attach,
>> + .detach = dw_hdmi_bridge_detach,
>> .enable = dw_hdmi_bridge_enable,
>> .disable = dw_hdmi_bridge_disable,
>> .mode_set = dw_hdmi_bridge_mode_set,
>
