The function tcphy_phy_init() could return an error but the callers
weren't checking the return value. They should. In at least one case
while testing I saw the message "wait pma ready timeout" which
indicates that tcphy_phy_init() really could return an error and we
should account for it.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders at chromium.org>
---
drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-typec.c | 13 +++++++++----
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-typec.c b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-typec.c
index 4d2c57f21d76..38831eebc934 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-typec.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-typec.c
@@ -685,8 +685,11 @@ static int rockchip_usb3_phy_power_on(struct phy *phy)
if (tcphy->mode == new_mode)
goto unlock_ret;
- if (tcphy->mode == MODE_DISCONNECT)
- tcphy_phy_init(tcphy, new_mode);
+ if (tcphy->mode == MODE_DISCONNECT) {
+ ret = tcphy_phy_init(tcphy, new_mode);
+ if (ret)
+ goto unlock_ret;
+ }
/* wait TCPHY for pipe ready */
for (timeout = 0; timeout < 100; timeout++) {
@@ -760,10 +763,12 @@ static int rockchip_dp_phy_power_on(struct phy *phy)
*/
if (new_mode == MODE_DFP_DP && tcphy->mode != MODE_DISCONNECT) {
tcphy_phy_deinit(tcphy);
- tcphy_phy_init(tcphy, new_mode);
+ ret = tcphy_phy_init(tcphy, new_mode);
} else if (tcphy->mode == MODE_DISCONNECT) {
- tcphy_phy_init(tcphy, new_mode);
+ ret = tcphy_phy_init(tcphy, new_mode);
}
+ if (ret)
+ goto unlock_ret;
ret = readx_poll_timeout(readl, tcphy->base + DP_MODE_CTL,
val, val & DP_MODE_A2, 1000,
--
2.14.2.822.g60be5d43e6-goog
