On 19-09-17, 11:19, Heiko St?bner wrote: > Am Montag, 18. September 2017, 16:37:56 CEST schrieb Doug Anderson: > > (Untested) Can't you change the opp table and use the fancier > > operating point descriptions that give <target min max>? And that's exactly what I was going to suggest :) > funny, that I never noticed that opps are also specified for > (target, min, max) values. > > Thanks for pointing me to the right direction and this seems to > actually work. Although I noticed that obviously the max value > needs to always be the global maximum (1125000 here) for both > opp tables, to make the regulator framework happy. Great. -- viresh
