Hi Eddie, Caesar, Am Montag, 24. April 2017, 18:29:26 CEST schrieb Eddie Cai: > Hi Heiko > > 2017-04-24 17:15 GMT+08:00 Heiko St?bner <heiko at sntech.de>: > > Am Montag, 24. April 2017, 16:49:08 CEST schrieb Caesar Wang: > >> ? 2017?04?24? 16:26, Heiko St?bner ??: > >> > Hi Caesar, > >> > > >> > Am Montag, 24. April 2017, 14:18:50 CEST schrieb Caesar Wang: > >> >> Update the cpu opp table for rk3399 op1. > >> > > >> > Ideally this should contain something about the "why". > >> > Are these new voltage settings safer to operate under? > >> > >> The before opp table is for earlier batch of rk3399 SoCs, that's no > >> enough for the current and > >> newer batch of rk3399 op1. In order to suit for the rk3399 op1, we need > >> to little voltages changed. > > > > just to make sure, this is also safe for all the non-chromebook rk3399 socs > > (like the firefly and tv-boxes, etc), right? > This is only for op1. other 3399s should have a different opp table digging this up, as I'm right now working on a rk3399-firefly, could you provide the correct opp tables for the available rk3399 variants please? I.e. generally safe opps for boards like the firefly and the special ones for op1-based devices? Thanks Heiko
