[PATCH] watchdog: dw_wdt: fix overflow issue in dw_wdt_top_in_seconds

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



If top is 15, (1 << (16 + top)) may be negative.

Change-Id: I76e4a603a54f093e64a4b266008570e3afcdb35a
Signed-off-by: Huibin Hong <huibin.hong at rock-chips.com>
---
 drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c
index 6ea0634..059c974 100644
--- a/drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c
+++ b/drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c
@@ -81,7 +81,9 @@ static inline int dw_wdt_top_in_seconds(unsigned top)
 	 * There are 16 possible timeout values in 0..15 where the number of
 	 * cycles is 2 ^ (16 + i) and the watchdog counts down.
 	 */
-	return (1 << (16 + top)) / clk_get_rate(dw_wdt.clk);
+	unsigned int cycles = 1 << (16 + top);
+
+	return cycles / clk_get_rate(dw_wdt.clk);
 }
 
 static int dw_wdt_get_top(void)
-- 
1.9.1





[Index of Archives]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux