Hi Heiko,
Thanks your comments.
? 2017?07?23? 05:48, Heiko Stuebner ??:
> Hi Caesar,
>
> Am Montag, 17. Juli 2017, 16:14:31 CEST schrieb Caesar Wang:
>> As RK3399 had used the Power allocator thermal governor by default,
>> enabled this to manage thermals by dynamically allocating and limiting
>> power to devices.
>>
>> Also, this patch supported the dynamic-power-coefficient/sustainable_power
>> and GPU's power model for needed parameters with thermal IPA.
>>
>> The Thermal power allocator governor works optimatly with two passive trip
>> points, for the better performance we will use the trip-point0 with 70
>> degree above which the governor control starts operating and trip-point1
>> with 85 degree is the target temperature by controlling.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <wxt at rock-chips.com>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>> - foo@ will produce warnings when used without reg property.
>> - update the commit to explain the two passive trip points changed.
>>
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi | 62 +++++++++++++++-----------------
>> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
>> index 77d67cb..6d8a5eb 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
>> @@ -147,7 +147,7 @@
>> enable-method = "psci";
>> #cooling-cells = <2>; /* min followed by max */
>> clocks = <&cru ARMCLKB>;
>> - dynamic-power-coefficient = <100>;
>> + dynamic-power-coefficient = <436>;
>> };
>>
>> cpu_b1: cpu at 101 {
>> @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@
>> reg = <0x0 0x101>;
>> enable-method = "psci";
>> clocks = <&cru ARMCLKB>;
>> - dynamic-power-coefficient = <100>;
>> + dynamic-power-coefficient = <436>;
> Adjusting the coefficients should be a separate patch and the
> commit message should explain how they were calculated and
> why they are the exacter ones over the old values.
Okay, i don't know why the dynamic-power-coefficient is 100 for
b-cluster before.:-)
>
>
>> };
>> };
>>
>> @@ -690,24 +690,25 @@
>> };
>>
>> thermal_zones: thermal-zones {
>> - cpu_thermal: cpu {
>> + soc_thermal: soc-thermal {
>> polling-delay-passive = <100>;
>> polling-delay = <1000>;
>> + sustainable-power = <1000>;
>>
>> thermal-sensors = <&tsadc 0>;
>>
>> trips {
>> - cpu_alert0: cpu_alert0 {
>> + threshold: trip-point0 {
>> temperature = <70000>;
>> hysteresis = <2000>;
>> type = "passive";
>> };
>> - cpu_alert1: cpu_alert1 {
>> - temperature = <75000>;
>> + target: trip-point1 {
>> + temperature = <85000>;
>> hysteresis = <2000>;
>> type = "passive";
>> };
>> - cpu_crit: cpu_crit {
>> + soc_crit: soc-crit {
>> temperature = <95000>;
>> hysteresis = <2000>;
>> type = "critical";
>> @@ -716,45 +717,31 @@
>>
>> cooling-maps {
>> map0 {
>> - trip = <&cpu_alert0>;
>> + trip = <&target>;
> still both maps use &target as trip point. Is that intentional
> and if so, why is the &threshold trip point never referenced?
For the power allocator governor, the &threshold trip point just control
starts operating, not need for map.
For other governor (e.g: step_wise) will need the first trip point.
Looks like we have to think about how to support them.
> };
> };
>
> @@ -1451,8 +1438,17 @@
> <GIC_SPI 21 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;
> interrupt-names = "gpu", "job", "mmu";
> clocks = <&cru ACLK_GPU>;
> + #cooling-cells = <2>;
> power-domains = <&power RK3399_PD_GPU>;
> status = "disabled";
> +
> + gpu_power_model: power_model {
> + compatible = "arm,mali-simple-power-model";
> + static-coefficient = <1079403>;
> + dynamic-coefficient = <977>;
> + ts = <32000 4700 (-80) 2>;
> + thermal-zone = "gpu-thermal";
> + };
> You might want to have the gpu thermal work without the
> power-model-thingy for now, so most likely just drop that
> gpu-related change for now.
Well, I guess the mediatek/hisilicon/rockchip ARM SoCs should support
the gpu's power mode with private kernel,
not in the upstream kernel.
-Caesar
>
>
> Heiko
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-rockchip mailing list
> Linux-rockchip at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
