Hello Daniel!
:
> +
> +&timer {
> + compatible = "rockchip,rk3228-timer", "rockchip,rk3288-timer";
> +};
> 23 ???. 2017 ?., ? 18:40, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano at linaro.org> ???????(?):
>
> I'm not sure this is correct, to which timer &timer will refer ?
>
> timer {
> compatible = "arm,armv7-timer";
> ...
> }
>
> timer: timer at 110c0000 {
> compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-timer";
> ...
> }
The block '&timer { ?}' change compatible string for 'timer: timer at 110c0000? timer'. It refers to it using ?timer:? label.
'arm,armv7-timer? has ?timer? node name without label and cannot be addressed in underline dts files.
> Why not change the compatible string in the timer definition in rk322x.dtsi ?
Initially my patch series was for rk3188 only. I declared rk3188 timer using rk3228 compatible string[1].
Heiko reviewed the series and suggest[2] to use another ?compatible=? binding for rk3188. And
suggest[3] to update rockchip,rk-timer.txt bindings, like mmc/rockchip-dw-mshc.txt does.
So I updated rockchip,rk-timer.txt. rk322x family has has two parts rk3228 and rk3229. So I replaced
rk322x to rk3228 and rk3229 and updated dts file to match bindings.
[1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-rockchip/2016-November/013152.html
[2] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-rockchip/2016-November/013174.html
[3] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-rockchip/2016-November/013174.html
> Same comment for the other patches doing these changes.
>
> -- Daniel
