Hi Laurent,
Am Montag, 4. Dezember 2017, 15:22:07 CET schrieb Laurent Pinchart:
> On Wednesday, 29 November 2017 20:47:55 EET Brian Norris wrote:
> > From: Nickey Yang <nickey.yang at rock-chips.com>
> >
> > We might include additional ports in derivative device trees, so the
> > 'port' node should have an address, and the parent 'ports' node needs
> > /#{addres,size}-cells.
> >
> > v4:
> > * keep #{address,size}-cells in both 'ports' and 'port at 0' nodes
> > * separate from the rest of the series, since this is mostly
> > independent of the driver refactoring
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nickey Yang <nickey.yang at rock-chips.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris at chromium.org>
>
> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com>
As I hadn't pushed that one yet, I've amended it with your Review-tag :-)
Thanks
Heiko
