Am Montag, 24. April 2017, 18:25:49 CEST schrieb Caesar Wang:
> ? 2017?04?24? 17:15, Heiko St?bner ??:
> > Am Montag, 24. April 2017, 16:49:08 CEST schrieb Caesar Wang:
> >> ? 2017?04?24? 16:26, Heiko St?bner ??:
> >>> Hi Caesar,
> >>>
> >>> Am Montag, 24. April 2017, 14:18:50 CEST schrieb Caesar Wang:
> >>>> Update the cpu opp table for rk3399 op1.
> >>>
> >>> Ideally this should contain something about the "why".
> >>> Are these new voltage settings safer to operate under?
> >>
> >> The before opp table is for earlier batch of rk3399 SoCs, that's no
> >> enough for the current and
> >> newer batch of rk3399 op1. In order to suit for the rk3399 op1, we need
> >> to little voltages changed.
> >
> > just to make sure, this is also safe for all the non-chromebook rk3399
> > socs
> > (like the firefly and tv-boxes, etc), right?
>
> No, just for chromebook.
>
> Maybe, we need support two table for rk3399 SoCs.
> For chromebook supporting 2GHz frequency and others support 1.8GHz
> frequency.
Definitly. So please move the chromebook opp-table to something like a rk3399-
op1-opp.dtsi and adapt rk3399-opp.dtsi to be safe for all rk3399 variants.
Thanks
Heiko
>
> For example:
> ....
> opp03 {
> opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1008000000>;
> opp-microvolt = <925000 925000 1350000>;
> opp-microvolt-l0 = <925000 925000 1350000>;
> opp-microvolt-l1 = <900000 900000 1350000>;
> };
> ....
>
>
>
> -Caesar
>
> > Thanks
> > Heiko
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-rockchip mailing list
> > Linux-rockchip at lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
