Am Mittwoch, 12. Oktober 2016, 20:31:41 CEST schrieb Shawn Lin: > rockchip_clk_register_ddrclk should not return NULL when faling > to call clk_register, otherwise rockchip_clk_register_branches > prints "unknown clock type". The acutal case is that it's a known > clock type but we fail to regiser it, which may makes user confuse > the reason of failure. And the pr_err here is pointless as > rockchip_clk_register_branches will also print the similar message. > > Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin at rock-chips.com> thanks for catching this ... applied to a clk-fixes branch for 4.9
