> 1 ???. 2016 ?., ? 0:30, Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org> ???????(?): > > 1st and 2nd are ambiguous. Plus this is an OS implementation detail that > doesn't belong in the binding. > >> +If you want to bind specific timer as clockevent (i.e. one from alive subsystem) >> +and specific timer as clocksource, you can number the timers in "aliases" node. > > No. > > Use and/or describe what are the features of a timer to make the > decision. There has to be some reason you care which one. One has an > interrupt and the other doesn't. One is always on. Etc. Thank you, Rob. Eventually I abandoned this decision. I left only one patch, which you confirmed recently. And sorry for making noise with duplicate patches. Alexander.
