Hello Heiko! > 24 ????. 2016 ?., ? 15:17, Heiko St?bner <heiko at sntech.de> ???????(?): > > When touching devicetree-properties, please also adapt the binding document > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/timer,rockchip,rk-timer.txt > in this case and also include the devicetree maintainers. Could you please clarify, i should send whole patch series and include devicetree maintainers for whole patch series or i should send devicetree patches separately? > 24 ????. 2016 ?., ? 16:21, Heiko St?bner <heiko at sntech.de> ???????(?): > > correct, use both but also update the binding, like > mmc/rockchip-dw-mshc.txt does. Here devicetree patch for this: http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg152246.html > 24 ????. 2016 ?., ? 17:32, Heiko St?bner <heiko at sntech.de> ???????(?): > >> I may suggest such solution here: if I want clocksource, I have to declare >> two timer in device tree. First probed timer would be clockevent and second >> one would be clocksource. All other timers will be ignored. Is that >> solution good? > > yep, sounds good, especially as with your patch 9/9 you already declare these > necessary timers. > >> If I want one timer and want it be clocksource not clockevent how that >> situation should be configured? Device tree not good for this. Kconfig not >> good. Pass that configuration on kernel command line? > > simply ignore that case :-) Here devicetree patch for this: http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg152247.html And I?ll going to resend new patch series with discussed modifications. It will contain only rk_timer and dts modifications. I have to do more tests. Regards, Alexander.
