Hi Caesar, On 2016/11/9 21:21, Caesar Wang wrote: > From: zhangqing <zhangqing at rock-chips.com> > > 1.add pd node for RK3399 Soc > 2.create power domain tree > 3.add qos node for domain > 4.add the pd_sd consumers node I'm no sure if it is worth spliting out a seperated patch as it looks to me that you was doing 4 things within one patch, but anyway Tested-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin at rock-chips.com> > > Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang <zhangqing at rock-chips.com> > Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <wxt at rock-chips.com> > --- > > Changes in v2: > - v1 on https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9322553/ > - Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/386483 > - Verified on ChromeOS kernel4.4 > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi | 12 ++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi > index b401176..e5b5b3d 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi > @@ -253,6 +253,7 @@ > <&cru SCLK_SDMMC_DRV>, <&cru SCLK_SDMMC_SAMPLE>; > clock-names = "biu", "ciu", "ciu-drive", "ciu-sample"; > fifo-depth = <0x100>; > + power-domains = <&power RK3399_PD_SD>; > status = "disabled"; > }; > > @@ -691,6 +692,11 @@ > status = "disabled"; > }; > > + qos_sd: qos at ffa74000 { > + compatible = "syscon"; > + reg = <0x0 0xffa74000 0x0 0x20>; > + }; > + > qos_emmc: qos at ffa58000 { > compatible = "syscon"; > reg = <0x0 0xffa58000 0x0 0x20>; > @@ -839,6 +845,12 @@ > clocks = <&cru ACLK_GMAC>; > pm_qos = <&qos_gmac>; > }; > + pd_sd at RK3399_PD_SD { > + reg = <RK3399_PD_SD>; > + clocks = <&cru HCLK_SDMMC>, > + <&cru SCLK_SDMMC>; > + pm_qos = <&qos_sd>; > + }; > pd_vio at RK3399_PD_VIO { > reg = <RK3399_PD_VIO>; > #address-cells = <1>; > -- Best Regards Shawn Lin
