Hi Doug,
? 2016?11?10? 04:54, Doug Anderson ??:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 5:00 AM, William Wu <wulf at rock-chips.com> wrote:
>> We found that the system crashed due to 480MHz output clock of
>> USB2 PHY was unstable after clock had been enabled by gpu module.
>>
>> Theoretically, 1 millisecond is a critical value for 480MHz
>> output clock stable time, so we try to change the delay time
>> to 1.2 millisecond to avoid this issue.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: William Wu <wulf at rock-chips.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-inno-usb2.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-inno-usb2.c b/drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-inno-usb2.c
>> index ecfd7d1..8f2d2b6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-inno-usb2.c
>> +++ b/drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-inno-usb2.c
>> @@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ static int rockchip_usb2phy_clk480m_enable(struct clk_hw *hw)
>> return ret;
>>
>> /* waitting for the clk become stable */
>> - mdelay(1);
>> + udelay(1200);
> Several people who have seen this patch have expressed concern that a
> 1.2 ms delay is pretty long for something that's supposed to be
> "atomic" like a clk_enable(). Consider that someone might call
> clk_enable() while interrupts are disabled and that a 1.2 ms interrupt
> latency is not so great.
>
> It seems like this clock should be moved to be enabled in "prepare"
> and the "enable" should be a no-op. This is a functionality change,
> but I don't think there are any real users for this clock at the
> moment so it should be fine.
>
> (of course, the 1 ms latency that existed before this patch was still
> pretty bad, but ...)
Thanks a lot for your suggestion.
I agree with you. clk_enable() will call spin_lock_irqsave() to disable
interrupt, and we add
more than 1ms in clk_enable may cause big latency.
And according to clk_prepare() description:
In a simple case, clk_prepare can be used instead of clk_enable to
ungate a clk if the
operation may sleep. One example is a clk which is accessed over I2c.
So maybe we can remove the clock to clk_prepare.
Hi Heiko, Frank,
What do you think of it?
Best regards,
wulf
>
> -Doug
>
>
>
