On 2016/11/2 15:04, Jianqun Xu wrote:
> Fix aclk_emmcgrf to aclk_emmc_grf, and fix aclk_emmccore to be
> aclk_emmc_core.
>
What is the standard style should be?
TRM uses aclk_emmccore but not aclk_emmc_core, so should it be more
standrad to keep it as-is?
> Signed-off-by: Jianqun Xu <jay.xu at rock-chips.com>
> ---
> drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c
> index 2c7cba7..b3df2c6 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3399.c
> @@ -935,11 +935,11 @@ static struct rockchip_clk_branch rk3399_clk_branches[] __initdata = {
> RK3399_CLKGATE_CON(6), 13, GFLAGS),
> COMPOSITE_NOGATE(ACLK_EMMC, "aclk_emmc", mux_aclk_emmc_p, CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED,
> RK3399_CLKSEL_CON(21), 7, 1, MFLAGS, 0, 5, DFLAGS),
> - GATE(ACLK_EMMC_CORE, "aclk_emmccore", "aclk_emmc", CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED,
> + GATE(ACLK_EMMC_CORE, "aclk_emmc_core", "aclk_emmc", CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED,
> RK3399_CLKGATE_CON(32), 8, GFLAGS),
> GATE(ACLK_EMMC_NOC, "aclk_emmc_noc", "aclk_emmc", CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED,
> RK3399_CLKGATE_CON(32), 9, GFLAGS),
> - GATE(ACLK_EMMC_GRF, "aclk_emmcgrf", "aclk_emmc", CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED,
> + GATE(ACLK_EMMC_GRF, "aclk_emmc_grf", "aclk_emmc", CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED,
> RK3399_CLKGATE_CON(32), 10, GFLAGS),
>
> /* perilp0 */
>
--
Best Regards
Shawn Lin
