Am Donnerstag, 31. M?rz 2016, 19:15:43 schrieb Heiko Stuebner: > Am Samstag, 19. M?rz 2016, 09:04:08 schrieb Heiko Stuebner: > > Am Mittwoch, 16. M?rz 2016, 14:58:39 schrieb Andreas F?rber: > > > A dtc update results in warnings for nodes with reg property but > > > without > > > unit address in the node name, so rename /memory to /memory at 0. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Andreas F?rber <afaerber at suse.de> > > > > applied to a dts64-fixes branch for 4.6, after changing the commit > > message to ---- > > A dtc update results in warnings for nodes with reg property but without > > unit address in the node name, so rename /memory to /memory at startaddress > > (memory starts at 0 in the case of the rk3368). > > ---- > > > > To clarify that the @0 is not arbitary chosen. > > This dtc update in question hasn't landed in v4.6-rc1 and from what I > gathered will need some changes. The patch is obviously still correct, but > I have now moved it from v4.6-fixes to the regular v4.7 64bit dts > changes. also it seems "memory" is special and memory without unitname will stay allowed [0], especially as uboot or other bootloaders may expect such a node to insert the actual amount of memory into it. Looking at uboot, fdt_fixup_memory_banks seems to look explicitly for a "memory" node, so I'm actually not sure, if this is safe to keep at all. [0] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg494038.html
