On 03/22/2016 08:41 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: >>> So although it's small framework or just subdirectory, we would need >>> someone who can manage the framework to avoid further confusion if >>> necessary. >> So maybe it just doesn't need a maintainer, and maybe those the owner >> of the bridge driver should be responsible for choosing the tree which >> it's merged through along with updates. That's how dw-hdmi has been >> managed on the whole. >> >> It also means that the bridge driver maintainer is able to test changes >> to the bridge driver, rather than having some over-arching bridge >> subdirectory maintainer who doesn't have a clue whether the changes >> work on the hardware. >> >> IMHO, having bridge driver authors/maintainers look after their own >> code has many advantages. > The author just send me a pull request with acks from a git tree > that hopefully both people agreed and tested from. No need to > send this via another maintainer layer. > > Dave. > Wow, thanks all ! such cool news :-D I'll prepare my pull request soon - Yakir
