Hi Thierry, On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 18:54:38 +0100 Thierry Reding <thierry.reding at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 08:34:19AM -0800, Doug Anderson wrote: > > Thierry, > > > > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Doug Anderson <dianders at google.com> wrote: > > > So just to summarize: > > > > > > * Add pwm_get_state(), pwm_apply_state(), pwm_get_args(). > > > pwm_get_state() initially returns 0 for duty cycle if driver doesn't > > > support readout. > > > > > > * Re-implement pwm_get_period() (and maybe other similar functions) > > > atop pwm_get_state() as you describe earlier in the thread. > > > > > > * Document pwm_get_period() (and maybe other similar functions) as deprecated. > > > > > > * Fix drivers for all current 2 users of PWM regulator to support > > > hardware readout. > > > > > > * Update PWM regulator as you described earlier in the thread (Feb 23). > > > > > > * If PWM regulator is ever used on a new board whose PWM doesn't > > > support hardware readout, the voltage will change at probe time. > > > > > > > > > Did I get all that right? Thanks! > > > > Can you provide a "yes, you got that right" or a "no, you didn't > > understand"? That will unblock Boris, I think. > > Sounds about right. Hopefully this will eliminate any objections that > others had about the series. Okay, I'll rework the series accordingly and send a new version soon. Thanks, Boris -- Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com
