Hello Andreas, Heiko,
On 3/7/2016 1:35 PM, Andreas F?rber wrote:
> Hi Heiko,
>
> Am 07.03.2016 um 13:24 schrieb Heiko St?bner:
>> Am Montag, 7. M?rz 2016, 13:17:54 schrieb Andreas F?rber:
>>> Am 06.03.2016 um 20:53 schrieb Andreas F?rber:
>>>> On next-20160304 the GMAC seems to have regressed, it no longer finds the
>>>> PHY:
>>>>
>>>> libphy: PHY stmmac-0:ffffffff not found
snps,phy-addr is not correct. Can you check it?
In the stmmac_mdio if this is not passed as parameter the bus should
be scanned and the first IDs found should select the right address.
I suppose in your box there is a real transceiver, so maybe the patch
from Gabriel is not actually necessary.
>>>> eth0: Could not attach to PHY
>>>> stmmac_open: Cannot attach to PHY (error: -19)
>>>
>>> Still with us in next-20160307. CC'ing stmmac maintainers.
peppe
>>
>> do you remember from what revision you rebased away from, when it was still
>> working (as a known-good state)?
>
> Hm, next-20160111 possibly... leaving all the 5 days and 4 days ago
> changes as candidates ("stmmac: share reset function between dwmac100
> and dwmac1000" .. "stmmac: Fix 'eth0: No PHY found' regression").
>
> Regards,
> Andreas
>
