Hi, On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Heiko Stuebner <heiko at sntech.de> wrote: >> It looks like there are also more power domains that you haven't >> listed here (like PD_GMAC, for instance, or PD_CORE_L). Are you >> planning to add those in a followon patch? > > that reminds me, nodes with a reg property should have the base address in > the node name as well. Using the constant works nicely, as can be seen on > the rk3288 where we have for example: > > pd_vio at RK3288_PD_VIO I was wondering about that. The device tree bindings are similarly missing the reg from the example. I'm curious: for sorting purposes, are you supposed to know the underlying integer and use that for sorting, or sort by the name of the #define? -Doug