Hi, On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Mark Brown <broonie at kernel.org> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 09:53:11PM -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote: > >> Note that this patch is atop Boris's recent PWM regulator fixes. If >> desired it wouldn't be too hard to write it atop the old code, though >> quite honestly anyone using a PWM regulator should probably be using his >> new code. > > Oh, and the other thing I meant to say there: is that going anywhere? > It seems like the underlying PWM interface is still unclear for some > reason and there's been no comment on those bits of v3. As far as I know it is going somewhere, but it's not moving terribly quickly. At some point I think Boris got tired of posting huge patch sets and so split things in two. The first half did eventually land, but the second half is still outstanding and things seem quiet fro the last two weeks. From patchwork we have these outstanding: 9175319 [v3,01/14] pwm: Add an helper to prepare a new PWM state 9175345 [v3,02/14] pwm: Add two helpers to ease relative duty cycle ... 9175361 [v3,03/14] pwm: rockchip: Fix period and duty_cycle approximation 9175341 [v3,04/14] pwm: rockchip: Add support for hardware readout 9175335 [v3,05/14] pwm: rockchip: Avoid glitches on already running PWMs 9175337 [v3,06/14] pwm: rockchip: Add support for atomic update 9175265 [v3,07/14] pwm: sti: Add support for hardware readout 9175317 [v3,08/14] pwm: sti: Avoid glitches on already running PWMs 9175323 [v3,09/14] regulator: pwm: Adjust PWM config at probe time 9175305 [v3,10/14] regulator: pwm: Switch to the atomic PWM API 9175295 [v3,11/14] regulator: pwm: Properly initialize the ->state field 9175267 [v3,12/14] regulator: pwm: Retrieve correct voltage 9175279 [v3,13/14] regulator: pwm: Support extra continuous mode cases 9175273 [v3,14/14] regulator: pwm: Document pwm-dutycycle-unit and ... -Doug
