? 2016/6/3 20:36, Heiko St?bner ??: > Hi Shawn, > > Am Freitag, 3. Juni 2016, 20:34:52 schrieb Shawn Lin: >> How about merge it into your patch#3. > > see comments from Doug and me on previous version. > > clock-ids should always be separate patches, as we will need them in both > clock and devicetree branches, so they must be in a separate branch shared > between clock and dts branches. > Ah, I missed the previous version as I think it should be from non-version to v2 rather than from non-version to v1, which IIRC is from Doug. :) Anyway, thanks for explaining this. > > Heiko > >> On 2016/6/3 17:55, Lin Huang wrote: >>> Signed-off-by: Lin Huang <hl at rock-chips.com> >>> --- >>> Changes in v1: >>> - None >>> >>> include/dt-bindings/clock/rk3399-cru.h | 1 + >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/rk3399-cru.h >>> b/include/dt-bindings/clock/rk3399-cru.h index 50a44cf..8a0f0442 100644 >>> --- a/include/dt-bindings/clock/rk3399-cru.h >>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/rk3399-cru.h >>> @@ -131,6 +131,7 @@ >>> >>> #define SCLK_DPHY_RX0_CFG 165 >>> #define SCLK_RMII_SRC 166 >>> #define SCLK_PCIEPHY_REF100M 167 >>> >>> +#define SCLK_DDRCLK 168 >>> >>> #define DCLK_VOP0 180 >>> #define DCLK_VOP1 181 > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-rockchip mailing list > Linux-rockchip at lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip > -- Best Regards Shawn Lin
