Hi Heiko, On 06/02/2016 06:17 AM, Heiko St?bner wrote: > Hi Frank, > > Am Mittwoch, 1. Juni 2016, 16:09:41 schrieb Frank Wang: >>> You might want to add the bvalid and id interrupts for the otg phys as >>> well >>> already - would make handling legacy devicetree files easier. [= if they >>> get specified later, the driver would always need to also handle >>> devicetrees where they aren't specified]. >> >> Hmmm! you mean that I can specify these properties into documentation, >> even if the driver have not handled (implemented) them in current? > > The devicetree bindings are supposed to be a generic hardware-description. > And a driver then simply implements that binding. So if the interrupt is part > of the hardware it can be part of the binding, independent of the driver. > > I guess it really comes down to, will you need those interrupts later in the > driver, then they should definitly be specified now, as later on you cannot > require them anymore and always need to also support devicetrees not having > them. > Got it, I have already added them in the new patches which I will hand out later. BR. Frank
