Hi Tom,
On 2016-1-13 23:21, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 04:53:15PM +0800, Jeffy Chen wrote:
>
>> Android images don't have a fdt.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen at rock-chips.com>
>> Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v4: None
>> Changes in v3: None
>> Changes in v2: None
>>
>> common/image-fdt.c | 4 ++++
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/common/image-fdt.c b/common/image-fdt.c
>> index 5e4e5bd..41aaa0d 100644
>> --- a/common/image-fdt.c
>> +++ b/common/image-fdt.c
>> @@ -379,6 +379,10 @@ int boot_get_fdt(int flag, int argc, char * const argv[], uint8_t arch,
>> (long)fdt_addr);
>> }
>> break;
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ANDROID_BOOT_IMAGE
>> + case IMAGE_FORMAT_ANDROID:
>> + goto no_fdt;
>> +#endif
>> default:
>> puts("ERROR: Did not find a cmdline Flattened Device Tree\n");
>> goto no_fdt;
> Hang on, this doesn't seem right. Rob or Paul can you comment more
> here? I know we've gone through some issues in the past with respect to
> booting Android and FDT. Thanks!
Oh! How careless i was...Seems we don't need this patch, the default
case is enough :)
