On 12/07/2016 06:27 AM, zain wang wrote: > We will ignored PSR setting if panel not support it. So, in this case, we should > return from analogix_dp_enable/disable_psr() without any error code. > Let's retrun 0 instead of -EINVAL when panel not support PSR in > analogix_dp_enable/disable_psr(). Thanks. Pushed to drm-misc after wrapping the commit message text. Archit > > Signed-off-by: zain wang <wzz at rock-chips.com> > --- > > Changes in v2: > - Remove dev_warn if panel not support PSR. > > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c > index 6e0447f..eb9bf87 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c > @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ int analogix_dp_enable_psr(struct device *dev) > struct edp_vsc_psr psr_vsc; > > if (!dp->psr_support) > - return -EINVAL; > + return 0; > > /* Prepare VSC packet as per EDP 1.4 spec, Table 6.9 */ > memset(&psr_vsc, 0, sizeof(psr_vsc)); > @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ int analogix_dp_disable_psr(struct device *dev) > struct edp_vsc_psr psr_vsc; > > if (!dp->psr_support) > - return -EINVAL; > + return 0; > > /* Prepare VSC packet as per EDP 1.4 spec, Table 6.9 */ > memset(&psr_vsc, 0, sizeof(psr_vsc)); > -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
