On 2016?08?23? 04:30, Sean Paul wrote: > On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 6:02 AM, Mark yao <mark.yao at rock-chips.com> wrote: >> On 2016?08?18? 17:11, Daniel Vetter wrote: >>> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 05:08:14PM +0800, Mark yao wrote: >>>>> Hi Sean >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for send v3 patch for rk3399 vop support. >>>>> >>>>> But sorry for that, I had changed my mind, those patches are deprecated, >>>>> I have new rk3399 patch on my downstream kernel, I will upstream soon. >>> Wut? Imo merge Sean's patch here, and then rebase your downstream patches >>> on top of it. That you have a downstream tree which is out of sync with >>> upstream shouldn't be a reason to stall upstream development. >>> -Daniel >>> >> Yeah, Sorry for that. >> >> In fact, on my downstream kernel, also have those patches, my new rk3399 >> patches are based on them, >> but the new rk3399 patches will cover the those patches, Sean's patches is >> old version. >> >> I just want to fast forward, don't want to send two version drivers to >> upstream. >> but if you and Dave feel ok for that, I have no problem:-) . >> >> merged Sean's patches and then apply new version patches. >> > Ok, so can I get a review/ack for these revised patches then? > Something is better than nothing, and there's a bunch of stuff that > depends on these changes. > > Sean Yes, But I miss your [PATCH v3 0/5] and [PATCH v3 4/5]. do you mean the lost patches use v2 version? > > >> Thanks. >> >> -- >> ?ark Yao >> >> > > -- ?ark Yao
