On 10/02/2015 05:43 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On 2 October 2015 at 09:53, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung at samsung.com> wrote: >> On 10/02/2015 04:06 PM, Heiko St?bner wrote: >>> Am Freitag, 2. Oktober 2015, 11:52:00 schrieb Jaehoon Chung: >>>> On 10/02/2015 06:05 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote: >>>>> On 1 October 2015 at 19:35, Stephen Boyd <sboyd at codeaurora.org> wrote: >>>>>> On 10/01, Heiko St?bner wrote: >>>>>>> Am Donnerstag, 1. Oktober 2015, 11:54:24 schrieb Ulf Hansson: >>>>>>>> On 30 September 2015 at 16:55, Heiko St?bner <heiko at sntech.de> wrote: >>>>>>>>> Am Mittwoch, 30. September 2015, 16:42:05 schrieb Ulf Hansson: >>>>>>>>>> On 30 September 2015 at 16:07, Heiko Stuebner <heiko at sntech.de> >>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> The clock changes of course only touch internals of the phase-clocks, >>>>>>>>> so >>>>>>>>> should have no problem going through another tree. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What happens if I take mmc and dt changes, wouldn't I need the clock >>>>>>>> patches as well? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The API stays of course the same, only the degree to settings >>>>>>> translation gets optimized, so I guess in the worst case you would get >>>>>>> no good phase and thus fall back to non-highspeed modes - but the >>>>>>> system would stay running. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> But of course, if the clock maintainers could Ack the two clock patches >>>>>>> and >>>>>>> everything would stay together that would work even better :-) >>>>>> >>>>>> If Ulf doesn't want to take them we can apply them to clk tree. >>>>>> Otherwise, you can have my acked-by on the clk patches. >>>>> >>>>> I don't mind picking up the clock patches. So I consider this as an >>>>> ack for both patch 1 and patch2, thanks. >>>>> >>>>> Now, let's give Jaehoon some time to review the dw_mmc parts. >>>> >>>> I will check other patches on today, if it's ok, i will apply at my >>>> repository. Thanks for giving time! :) >>> >>> I think Ulf wanted to apply the whole series via the mmc tree directly, but I >>> guess that is between you two to decide ;-) >> >> If it will get Stephen's acked-by, i will pick up all after checked the dwmmc patches. how about? > > Stephen already acked the clock patches from this thread. > > Perhaps this time, it's easier if you ack the dw_mmc patches and I can > pick up the hole series? Does that work for you? I doesn't review dwmmc patches (Sorry), could you give me more time? If you're ok, i will notice to you...then you can pick up all. :) Best Regards, Jaehoon Chung > > Kind regards > Uffe >
