On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 09:56:32AM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote: > +++ b/drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c > @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ static int pwm_regulator_set_voltage_sel(struct regulator_dev *rdev, > int dutycycle; > int ret; > > - pwm_reg_period = pwm_get_period(drvdata->pwm); > + pwm_reg_period = pwm_get_default_period(drvdata->pwm); > > dutycycle = (pwm_reg_period * > drvdata->duty_cycle_table[selector].dutycycle) / 100; It's not clear to me that we're not looking for the current period here or in the other use. Won't configuring based on a period other than the one that has been set give the wrong answer? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 473 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-rockchip/attachments/20151116/24b079fa/attachment.sig>
