On 11/02/2015 04:33 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 02 November 2015 13:56:31 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> static inline void rk_timer_disable(struct clock_event_device *ce)
>> {
>> writel_relaxed(TIMER_DISABLE, rk_base(ce) + TIMER_CONTROL_REG);
>> - dsb();
>> + dsb(sy);
>> }
>>
>> static inline void rk_timer_enable(struct clock_event_device *ce, u32 flags)
>> {
>> writel_relaxed(TIMER_ENABLE | TIMER_INT_UNMASK | flags,
>> rk_base(ce) + TIMER_CONTROL_REG);
>> - dsb();
>> + dsb(sy);
>> }
>>
>>
>
> This will fail the compile test, because dsb() is not available on non-ARM
> architectures. Would it be enough to just use the normal writel() accessor
> here?
That's a good question and I believe we can remove it but I have to
setup a rockchip board before doing the changes in order to test.
I the meantime added the COMPILE_TEST option but restricted it to ARM
and ARM64.
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
