Hi Doug, Am Donnerstag, 21. Mai 2015, 08:40:55 schrieb Doug Anderson: > On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 7:02 PM, Huang, Tao <huangtao at rock-chips.com> wrote: > >> It turns out that's not a safe assumption. In some cases (pending > >> interrupts) it's possible that the WFI might act as a no-op and the > >> MaskROM will never run. > > Anyway, restore the value is okay, which make the code more symmetrically > > OK. Heiko: applying this won't hurt, but it will only be useful if we > find a way to return from the WFI successfully... As it looks sane but doesn't fix an immediate problem I have applied this to my soc-branch for 4.2 . Thanks Heiko
