Am Donnerstag, 14. Mai 2015, 01:13:14 schrieb Heiko Stuebner: > Am Mittwoch, 13. Mai 2015, 23:23:15 schrieb Heiko Stuebner: > > Am Freitag, 6. M?rz 2015, 19:03:58 schrieb Heiko Stuebner: > > > GPL2/X11 seems to be the consensus to go for devicetree files, as shown > > > for > > > examply by armada, meson and sunxi. > > > > > > We already have the new board-files licensed under this combination, so > > > complete the transition for the older files. > > > > > > Heiko Stuebner (8): > > > ARM: dts: rockchip: relicense rk3xxx.dtsi under GPLv2/X11 > > > ARM: dts: rockchip: relicense rk3066a.dtsi under GPLv2/X11 > > > ARM: dts: rockchip: relicense rk3188.dtsi under GPLv2/X11 > > > ARM: dts: rockchip: relicense rk3288.dtsi under GPLv2/X11 > > > ARM: dts: rockchip: relicense rk3288-thermal.dtsi under GPLv2/X11 > > > ARM: dts: rockchip: relicense rk3066a-bqcurie2.dts under GPLv2/X11 > > > ARM: dts: rockchip: relicense rk3188-radxarock.dts under GPLv2/X11 > > > ARM: dts: rockchip: relicense rk3288-evb* under GPLv2/X11 > > > > just for me to keep track, I've now applied patches 1,2,3 and 5 that got > > all necessary ACKs so far. > > and now also patches 6 and 7. > > That leaves patches 4 and 8 in this series that still need some acks. and for completeness sake, patches 4 and 8 now also have all the necessary ACKs
